Protest Chaos: Judge SLAMS LAPD Tactics

A federal judge’s ban on LAPD’s use of 40mm launchers during protests underscores the ongoing battle over law enforcement accountability.

Story Highlights

• LAPD’s use of 40mm launchers is restricted by a federal judge’s ruling.
• The ruling followed incidents during immigration protests in 2025.
• Contempt rulings highlight gaps in LAPD’s adherence to restrictions.
• Concerns arise over the balance between protester safety and police tactics.

Judge Marshall’s Contempt Ruling

In January 2026, U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall ruled that the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) had violated a 2021 injunction by using 40mm less-lethal launchers inappropriately during protests. The ruling explicitly bans the use of these launchers in crowd control situations, reinforcing the importance of adhering to guidelines that prioritize public safety and accountability.

This decision followed the LAPD’s use of 40mm weapons during protests against federal immigration enforcement in the summer of 2025. The launchers, intended only for immediate threats to safety, were reportedly fired at non-threatening protesters and journalists, raising alarm over excessive force and misuse of power.

LAPD’s Internal Policy Scrutinized

The LAPD’s internal rulebook outlines the circumstances under which 40mm launchers can be used, intending to serve as a guide to ensure that these less-lethal weapons are only used when absolutely necessary. However, repeated violations during protests have called into question the department’s commitment to these standards.

Critics argue that the LAPD’s actions reflect a broader issue of accountability in law enforcement, with the use of force often overshadowing peaceful protest rights. The ruling by Judge Marshall insists on adherence to legal frameworks designed to protect citizens while allowing for effective law enforcement.

Impact on Law Enforcement and Accountability

The ruling has significant implications for the LAPD and other law enforcement agencies across California. It echoes a broader call for reform in police protocols, especially in managing protests. The LAPD’s interim ban on the use of 40mm launchers in crowd control aims to prevent further legal challenges and potential financial liabilities stemming from civil rights lawsuits.

The city of Los Angeles must now navigate the delicate balance between maintaining public order and respecting constitutional rights. As the LAPD faces ongoing scrutiny, the need for transparency and accountability remains a top priority, ensuring that law enforcement actions are measured and just.

Sources:

LAPD barred from using rubber bullets during protests

Federal judge bars LAPD use of some less-lethal weapons at protests

LAPD military weapons city council vote

LAPD rulebook shows when cops can — and can’t — fire ‘non-lethal’ weapons