2 Somali Woman CAUGHT – Another Fraud Scandal Exposed!

targetliberty.org — Federal prosecutors say two Minnesota women turned a publicly funded autism therapy program into a personal cash machine, billing Medicaid for services that were never delivered and funneling millions overseas before investigators caught up with them.

Story Snapshot

Shamso Ahmed Hassan and Hanaan Mursal Yusuf face federal charges tied to a scheme prosecutors say generated over $21 million in fraudulent Medicaid reimbursements.
Prosecutors allege parents were paid $300 to $1,500 per month in kickbacks to enroll their children, while autism therapy services were billed but never actually provided.
Fraud proceeds were allegedly used to purchase real property and transfer money overseas, including to Kenya.
The case is part of a sweeping Minnesota Medicaid fraud investigation that has now ensnared at least 15 defendants across multiple schemes totaling tens of millions in losses.

How a Children’s Therapy Program Became a Billing Goldmine

Minnesota created its Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention program, known as EIDBI, to fund medically necessary autism therapy for people under 21. The program was designed with good intentions, but its reimbursement structure created a vulnerability that federal investigators say became impossible to ignore. Providers could submit claims for services with limited real-time verification, generating large payouts before auditors identified discrepancies. That gap, according to prosecutors, is exactly what the defendants exploited.

Asha Farhan Hassan, 28, was the first charged in the investigation. Federal prosecutors say she formed Smart Therapy LLC, enrolled it as a Medicaid provider, and collected more than $14 million in reimbursement funds for autism services that were billed but not delivered. The Department of Justice charged her by federal information with wire fraud, a charging method that typically signals cooperation with prosecutors. Her case opened the door to a broader indictment targeting the larger network behind the scheme.

The Alleged Kickback Structure That Recruited Families Into the Fraud

Prosecutors allege the scheme did not operate in isolation. Parents were allegedly paid between $300 and $1,500 per month to enroll their children in autism centers controlled by the defendants. That payment structure, if proven, transforms the fraud from a simple billing scam into an organized operation with recruited participants. Shamso Ahmed Hassan, 55, and Hanaan Mursal Yusuf are named in the broader indictment tied to the $21 million figure, with prosecutors alleging they helped operate the autism centers at the center of the scheme.

The prosecution’s theory connects ownership and control of the autism centers directly to the defendants. Federal charging documents state that Hassan was listed as sole owner of Smart Therapy LLC and that Yusuf helped operate the center. Whether the defense can produce corporate records, operating agreements, or billing documentation that challenges that narrative remains to be seen. Both defendants have entered not guilty pleas, and the evidentiary battle over business records, bank statements, and service logs is still ahead.

Money Traced to Property and Overseas Transfers

The most damaging allegation beyond the billing fraud itself is where the money went. Prosecutors say fraud proceeds were used to purchase real property and were transferred abroad, including to Kenya. Tracing illicit funds to foreign destinations is a significant escalation in any federal fraud case. It signals that investigators obtained bank subpoenas and followed the money through multiple layers of transactions. If the government’s financial tracing holds up in court, it will be extraordinarily difficult for the defense to argue the proceeds were legitimate earnings from real services rendered.

🚨DHS just arrested two Minnesota women for $21 MILLION in healthcare fraud.
Shamso Ahmed Hassan (naturalized U.S. citizen) and Hanaan Mursal Yusuf ran autism therapy centers and allegedly bilked Medicaid’s autism program with fake claims, kickbacks, and money laundering.
They… pic.twitter.com/SgAitvFhp6

— Dear Patriot (@Dear_Patriot) May 28, 2026

This case does not exist in a vacuum. Minnesota has become the backdrop for a string of Medicaid fraud prosecutions throughout the 2020s, with federal authorities expanding investigations across autism services, disability programs, and child nutrition funding. The Department of Justice has now charged at least 15 individuals across related schemes, with total alleged losses reaching into the tens of millions. The pattern is consistent: programs designed to serve vulnerable populations, weak real-time verification, and providers who treated public money as a personal revenue stream. The common-sense conclusion is that Minnesota’s Medicaid oversight failed badly, and American taxpayers paid for it.

What the Evidence Needs to Prove Before Any Verdict Is Written

The charges are serious, the dollar figures are large, and the allegations of overseas transfers add a layer of deliberateness that is hard to explain away. But the public record right now reflects the government’s version of events. The defense has not yet presented its counter-narrative in court, and no trial ruling has been issued. Prosecutors control the most probative evidence, including bank subpoenas, search warrant returns, and seized business records. The defendants are entitled to contest every element of the government’s case, and the strength of that case will ultimately be tested at trial, not in a press release.

That said, the prosecution’s documented specificity on billing volumes, ownership structures, kickback payments, and fund transfers reflects an investigation built on hard evidence rather than circumstantial inference. When federal prosecutors trace specific dollar amounts to specific accounts and specific foreign destinations, they are not guessing. The public interest in this case is straightforward: a program funded by taxpayers to help children with autism was allegedly turned into a personal enrichment vehicle, and the families whose children were enrolled were allegedly paid to look the other way. If the evidence holds, accountability is not just appropriate. It is overdue.