Recent Case Reignites Debate On Connecticut’s Conditional Release Policy

After intense scrutiny and debate, a Connecticut man infamous for a gruesome crime receives conditional release, raising complex questions on the balance between rehabilitation and public safety.

Quick Takes

Tyree Smith, found not guilty by reason of insanity for murder and cannibalism, is conditionally released from a psychiatric hospital.
Smith’s release decision, received with public and bipartisan criticism, includes strict supervision and ongoing treatment.
State professionals confirm Smith’s mental disorders are in remission due to intensive treatment.
Victim’s family and GOP lawmakers express deep concerns over this decision, stressing public safety risks.

The Case and Conditional Release

In 2012, Tyree Smith was arrested for the murder of Angel Gonzalez after being found in a vacant apartment. Smith was later found not guilty by reason of insanity due to schizophrenia and substance disorders. Initially sentenced to 60 years at Whiting Forensic Hospital, his conditional release is now approved due to expert testimony that his mental disorders are under control through medication.

Smith’s release is under stringent rules such as close supervision and continuous treatment. The Connecticut Psychiatric Security Review Board sanctioned the release after reviewing Smith’s adherence and recovery. Despite this, released details indicate initial restrictions to hospital grounds, easing into potential supervised community engagement.

⚠️ WARNING: This post contains graphic descriptions of violence & cannibalism

Tyree Smith, who was found “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity” in 2013 for the murder & cannibalism of Angel Gonzalez, 43, has been granted conditional release by the Connecticut Psychiatric Security… pic.twitter.com/zSIZCbnE58

— True Crime Updates (@TrueCrimeUpdat) February 23, 2025

Controversy and Public Concerns

The critical decision received strong criticism, particularly from families affected and GOP lawmakers labeling it “mind-boggling.” The release stirred debates on social media and from government circles regarding public risk and accountability. Talitha Frazier, Gonzalez’s sister-in-law, questioned, “How do we really know he’s not going to do this again?” casting broader doubts about the safeguards in place.

Board approvals are based on stringent testimonies indicating Smith has maintained a calming presence for other patients and has shown documented recovery. However, questions remain on accountability should rehabilitation fail and trigger further risks. The family advocates have also expressed unrelenting concerns over the effectiveness of monitoring such released individuals.

CT is officially trending…. for all the wrong reasons ~ yet again! @CTGOP @CTCentinal @kateinthemix @ThisRepubGirl @CMBornFree @MonaColwell @KristiTalmadge @TonyDeAngelo7 @GeorgeColli @JCherrySparks @ctltribune https://t.co/DPHCa77yKH

— TeamRealityCT 💜🐭 (@TeamRealityCT) February 23, 2025

The Path Forward

Forensic psychiatrist Dr. Caren Teitelbaum described him as a “joy” and a supportive influence, showcasing potential recovery reinforcement. Despite extensive debate surrounding public safety, discussions pivot on crafting a framework to balance both recovery opportunities with unwavering community protection.

This case underscores intricate judicial and psychological milestones amid societal apprehensions. As Smith embarks on a structured reintegration journey, stakeholders remain engaged to ensure safety doesn’t compromise alongside rehabilitation efforts.