Kamala Harris’s National Security Role: Impact on Future Presidential Hopes?

A woman speaking with an American flag in background.

Vice President Kamala Harris’s national security competence faces scrutiny as her presidential aspirations collide with global challenges.

At a Glance

  • Harris’s approach to migration from Central America focuses on long-term solutions
  • Critics question her national security competence following a Fox News interview
  • Concerns raised about Harris’s awareness of threats from China and other global issues
  • The Biden-Harris administration faces criticism for its handling of foreign policy challenges

Harris’s Approach to Migration and National Security

Vice President Kamala Harris, tasked by President Biden to address root causes of migration from Central America’s Northern Triangle, has chosen a long-term strategy that some view as inadequate for immediate border security concerns. Her focus on boosting private investment in the region has yielded over $5.2 billion in investment promises, with $1.3 billion already invested by June 2024.

“She felt — and I think she was right — that what she could do the most was help basically lead the effort to draw in investment, using the confidence that a relationship with the White House would give to investors.” – Ricardo Zúniga

However, critics argue that Harris’s approach falls short, suggesting that these investments might have occurred regardless of her involvement. The effectiveness of her strategy remains a topic of debate, with some attributing reduced migration from the Northern Triangle to her efforts, while others remain skeptical.

Concerns Over National Security Competence

Recent criticism of Harris’s national security competence emerged following her interview with Fox News’s Bret Baier. The Vice President’s failure to address pressing issues such as the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and China’s aggressive international maneuvers raised eyebrows among conservative commentators.

Harris’s omission of China as a significant threat, focusing instead solely on Iran, has been interpreted by some as a lack of strategic awareness. This perceived shortfall in understanding global challenges has led to questions about her readiness to assume presidential responsibilities in the face of complex international situations.

China’s Military Exercises and U.S. Response

The article highlights concerns about China’s aggressive military posture, exemplified by Exercise Joint Sword 2024B, where People’s Liberation Army forces encircled Taiwan. The involvement of the Chinese Coast Guard in these exercises is seen as part of a comprehensive strategy to control Taiwan, raising alarms about the Biden-Harris administration’s response.

Critics point to the downsizing of the U.S. Navy and what they perceive as a lack of action in addressing China’s aggressive moves. These observations fuel doubts about Harris’s ability to effectively manage and deter threats from the Chinese Communist Party.

Afghanistan Withdrawal and Its Aftermath

The third anniversary of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan has reignited discussions about the Biden-Harris administration’s foreign policy decisions. The absence of both Vice President Harris and President Biden during the commemoration has not gone unnoticed, particularly as families of the 13 service members who died in Kabul requested former President Donald Trump to lay a wreath at Arlington National Cemetery.

“Harris is said to have been “the last person in the room” as the fateful decision was made to evacuate Afghanistan, even as the Taliban violated Trump’s conditions-based withdrawal agreement.” – Source

Critics argue that Harris’s involvement in the decision to evacuate Afghanistan, despite the Taliban’s violation of the withdrawal agreement, reflects poorly on her judgment in national security matters. This criticism extends to the administration’s handling of other foreign policy challenges, including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the resurgence of Iran-backed terrorism.

Implications for Presidential Aspirations

As discussions about the 2024 presidential election intensify, Harris’s perceived shortcomings in national security matters could potentially impact her future political aspirations. Critics argue that her apparent lack of strategic understanding and plan to deter aggression from adversaries like China raise questions about her readiness to lead the country in an increasingly complex global landscape.

The ongoing scrutiny of Harris’s national security competence underscores the importance of demonstrating a clear and comprehensive understanding of global challenges for any potential presidential candidate. As the Biden-Harris administration continues to navigate various international crises, Harris’s ability to address these concerns effectively may play a crucial role in shaping her political future.

Sources:

  1. Kamala Harris chose a long-term approach when tasked to tackle rise in border crossings
  2. The Strategic Consequences Of Kamala Harris’ Incompetence
  3. Kamala Harris’ Unserious Foreign Policy Is A National Security Threat