(TargetLiberty.org) – Late last week, a U.S. federal court ruled against the restrictions imposed by the Biden administration on an imminent offshore oil and gas lease sale. Judge James Cain of the Western District of Louisiana favored a preliminary injunction put forward by plaintiffs including the State of Louisiana, American Petroleum Institute (API), Chevron, and Shell. They opposed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) constraints on Lease Sale 261, a massive sale covering the Gulf of Mexico set for the upcoming week.
Judge Cain mandated that the sale continue under its initial terms by September 30. Earlier, BOEM, in an agreement with environmental entities, had excluded nearly six million acres and set various regulations for oil and gas vessels to protect the Gulf’s Rice’s whale.
Judge Cain emphasized the significant potential costs the plaintiffs highlighted due to the contested measures. He remarked that the government’s primary attention was on acreage reduction, but many hardships were due to the vessel regulations. He also suggested that the administration’s moves might have a political undertone rather than a true commitment to environmental conservation.
API’s Senior Vice President, Ryan Meyers, expressed satisfaction with the decision, stating that it ensures American energy security. He emphasized the ruling’s importance in providing clarity for American energy professionals and boosting the Gulf Coast economy.
The lawsuit against the Biden administration had been initiated by API and its partners in late August. They emphasized the significance of such sales for long-term energy production.
Regarding the sale’s specifics, BOEM had planned to present about 67 million acres across the Gulf, which was less than their original plan of 73.4 million acres. The areas excluded were potential oil reservoirs.
Historically, offshore lease sales cover extensive federal waters, but actual bids are received only for selected blocks believed to be more resource-rich.
Erik Milito, the National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA) president, commented that the court’s decision was vital, as the administration’s initial move stemmed from a deal with activist groups, neglecting the law and public opinion.
BOEM’s constraints were also related to the administration’s settlement with environmental organizations, including the Sierra Club. They had previously sued the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for not adequately evaluating the oil sector’s impact on marine life in the Gulf.
The environmental entities’ legal action originated after NMFS initiated a study on how federally regulated oil and gas actions could affect endangered species in the Gulf for the next half-century. These groups contended that NMFS’s findings were not scientifically robust.
Both API and NOIA argued that BOEM’s actions contradicted the Inflation Reduction Act’s intent, which had reintroduced several lease sales, including Lease Sale 261, after they were canceled by the Biden administration in 2022. The sale was expected to be comprehensive, but its environmental analysis didn’t factor in potential threats to the Rice’s whale.
Copyright 2023, TargetLiberty.org
